Posted: August 27th, 2021
Final Public Administration of $10 Million for the Budgetary Allocation of City Council’s Fiscal Year Expenditure
Student’s Name
Course Name and Number
Instructor’s Name
Date Submitted
Introduction
With the study of public administration being considered normative in reality, its practice instead seems pragmatic in the application. Ideally, the practice of public administration is associated with the principles of efficiency and economy. Specifically, a public officer entrusted with drafting a budget needs to make proposals in line with the estimated costs. It implies that the drafting of a proposal for both the Mayor and City Council needs to meet the minimum costs. Therefore, this paper discusses the provision of a business plan in the way$10 million will be effectively and efficiently allocated to help meet the City Council’s expenditure with a population size of 250,000 people.
Examining Differences between Public and Private Sector Accounting Principles
The principle of private-sector accounting has set forth a precedent benching for public sector accounting. Notably, public sector accounting practice presently follows the guidelines of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (Chan 13). Since both the private and public sector principles might seem alike, significant differences distinguish their applications. For example, public sector accounting principles entail economy, efficiency, consistency, and historical prudence. On the contrary, the principles that govern the application of private sector accounting compose of cost, matching, full disclosure, and objectivity. Whereas the principle of objectivity drives the implementation of private sector accounting, the minimum cost principle governs the working dynamics of public administration (Chan 13). Therefore, the business plan for City Council will involve efficient utilization of $10 million to cover all the expenses at minimum costs.
Integrating Fund Accounting and Financial Controls
The idea of fund accounting revolves around the money in the account gathered for an exact eventual purpose. Notably, this concept has existed throughout governmental accounting history in the US(Chan 14). The fund accounting execution occurs across the suggestion of various expendable fund entities, such as proprietary and fiduciary. Similarly, the implementation of fund accounting requires the integration of financial controls to extend the expenditure of government activities over a year. Therefore, the purposes for which such funds are spent needs to be prescribed to enhance an exclusive coverage of all the expenditure items. In this case, the allocated $10 million need to cater for all the running costs of 250,000 people in the City Council. An example of fund accounting entails implementing a capital project like a debt service fund intended to generalize both the interest and principal payments, especially on a long-term basis(Chan 14). Categorically, the debt service fund has the features of financial controls, namely, interest account. Undoubtedly, there is a proper integration of both interest account coupled with a separate principal account. Therefore, fund accounting does not have fund resources (cash-inflows), a decrease in fund resources (cash-outflows), and a shift in fund balance(Chan 14). The integration of fund accounting with financial controls reinforces public sector accounting’s need to reveal both the accrual and budgetary accounting expressly. Consequently, the incorporation of financial controls and fund accounting brings about efficient utilization and control of funds.
Assessing Approaches to Control and Management of Public Expenditures
The application of public expenditure
management (PEM) for drafting and appropriating budget revolves around three
approaches. The approaches are relevant for allocating and controlling the
public expenditures (Chan 15). Indeed, the consideration of either one of the three
approaches aims to increase the preferred outcome for the City Council.
Categorically, the first mechanism involves aggregate fiscal discipline in that
the spending totals and decisions regarding such budgets need to be made
independently of each other. Similarly, the budget totals need to be enforced
throughout the fiscal year, thus preventing spending totals from surpassing the
demand limit.Imperatively,this approach to PEM will curb overspending, thus leading
to small deficit budget balances (Chan 15). The second mechanism to PEM is allocative efficiency,
where most of the spending decisions and responsibilities are made from the
decentralized ministries and departments. With budget supplementaryand cutbacks
have done at specific ministries and departments, this kind of approach averts
any budgetary conflicts since the informational demand is easily managed. Therefore,
the spenders do not have to jeopardize the whole process of setting priority and
implementing the budget because most strategic decision-making is done
centrally by the Office of the Mayor. The last measure to PEM is operational
efficiency, which shifts the consideration of spending control from budget
inputs to outputs. Undoubtedly, operational efficiency revolves around the
decentralization of the operating resources’ management process, intending to
sustain hard constraints on the costs of planning for the budget (Chan
16). Therefore, the whole approach
to PEM is advantageous in enhancing the entire budget-writing process’s
economy. Nonetheless, this business plan recommends using Operational
Efficiency as the best approach to PEM for administeringa $10 million fund.
Thus, the employment of such a technique to PEM for City Council ensures that
there will be a 100% match of the federal funds and total spending.
Explaining Government Financial Reporting
Requirements
Government financial reporting is a process by which a functional unit of both the local and federal authorities reports their financial positions and activities to the general public. Since these reports are generally standard, the public and oversight bodies can use such reports to measure the government’s efficiency, financial capacity, and effectiveness to administer expenditure (OECD 12). Regarding the GAAP, the public sector is expected to complete reports on cash flows, operations that promote profit-making, and the relevant sectors’ financial conditions. Therefore, most western democracies widely share the following basic requirements of financial reporting.
Credibility
Government financial reports must be trustworthy, objective, and reliable in providing information, which fits in line with the highly independent standards from relevant agencies.
Fair Presentation
To ensure effective administration of public funds, the government needs to reveal the most accuratefinancial conditions and its operating performance despite the difficulties associated with unnecessary disclosure of useful info.
Value Addition
Reporting a budget needs to happen in a manner that the relevant government will add value concerning its already disclosed fiscal information. Constrained by the government’s historical orientation and the unavoidable lag throughout the preparation plan, the substantial value of fiscal financial reports underscore the need to provide a long-term standpoint on developments.
Consistency and Uniformity
The financial reporting needs to employ similar measurement rules over time without initiating any circumstantial change that would decrease the reports’ understandability and comparability. Besides, financial, budgetary, and statistical reporting proceduresneed to be in harmony at all times.
Annual Financial Statements
At the end of every year, the government needs to issue three primary financial statements: balance sheet, statement of cash flow, and gains and losses.
Financial Disclosures
General financial statements need to be supplemented by extra-financial data to facilitate financial accountability and transparency. All these are done through the imposing of limitations by the accounting acknowledgment criteria together with measurement techniques.
Reporting Entity
A general financial statement needs to cover government in totality in terms ofthe principal government control entity to well-ordered entities for which the primary government is financially answerable. Similarly, the fiscal associations existing among these entities need clarification concerning the aggregated financial statements (OECD 15). Also, there is a need to have additional reporting on the government’s relevant ministries and departments’ preparedness to promote effective management and oversight.
Full Reporting Capacity
A government’s financial information system needs to have the capacity to generate data, which is useful for determining budget implementation and interim.
Apart from that, financial reporting seems one of the pillars that support better fiscal management. Specifically, high-quality financial reporting is vital in ensuring that the government’s fiscal decisions are genuinely accurate and updated (OECD 12). Therefore, financial reports’ usefulness extends to the point that legislators and auditors can hold the government responsible for service delivery and duties performance. Similarly, financial reports provide relevant info about markets for stakeholders to comprehend the government’s financial operations concerning economic decisions. Notably, high-quality financial reporting revolves around the need for requirements to sound complete regarding the entire government’s financial operations (OECD 13). Besides, the quality of financial reporting needs to express comprehensiveness in that all relevant info about entities are well covered. Also, the prerequisites of financial reporting need to concentrate on a heightened sense of external validation. In this regard, this business plan’s financial statements will be reported by improving the completeness of each financial report. Indeed, this will be done by putting into consideration the accrual accounting mechanisms (OECD 13). Thus, the implementation of accrual accounting is meant to create a balance sheet that would report on varying levels of assets and liabilities.
Analyzing Financial Statements and Budgets to Make Appropriate Administrative Decisions, and Apply the Budgets as a Disciplinary Process
The preparation of a government budget entails making difficult decisions at a particular cost. However, the City Council may choose to avoid such choices but would impact a far greater cost. Most importantly, the budget preparers need to undertake implicit trade-offs that are relevant in formulating the budget (Walther and Skousen 108) explicitly. Such actions would permit the seamless execution of prioritized programs while sidestepping other considerations of political programs. Therefore, it is inefficient to initiate postponement mechanisms that would delay the execution of the budget process despite hard choices. From this analysis of the budget, it is possible that the overestimation of the streams of revenue coupled with an effect of continued commitments must be implemented into the budget-making (Walther and Skousen 108). Such underestimations will sustain sharp cuts in the expenditure, thus making the budget seem easier. On the other hand, the overestimation of revenue streams, which results from technical factors like a bad appraisal, sustain an excessive number of programs on the budget, leading to downplayed difficulties throughout the control financing. The reason is that many quantities of expenditures seem similar to the financial constraints associated with preparing a budget. Furthermore, impacting the right tactics to effect changes on the unrealistic budget seems complicated, especially during the execution process. Indeed, the implementation of selective cash rationing affects the process of budget execution differently because varied substitute priorities delay the program activities (Walther and Skousen 108). Consequently, the application of budget as a disciplinary process would compel for the initiation of regulative commitment measures as a means of sidestepping hard budgetary choices. The following figures also involve the estimated budgets and financial statements associated with the City Council’s mandate to administer funds over a population of 250,000.
Table 1. Estimated budget expenditure for a City Council with a 250,000 population size
Expenditure Items | Amount in $ |
Wages | $2,220,000 |
Benefits | $2,177,000 |
Mandated programs | $2,045,000 |
Contracted services | $1,200,000 |
Sales Tax – City Council | $800,000 |
Inter-fund Transfers – Operating | $40,000 |
Inter-fund Transfers – Debt Service | $48,000 |
Scheduled Debt Service Payment | $82,000 |
Inter-departmentals | $67,000 |
All other | $1,321,000 |
Total Gross Expenses | $10,000,000 |
Table 2. Consolidated Revenues and Appropriations by Category
Revenues | General Funds ($) | Special Revenue Funds ($) | Debt Service Funds ($) | Internal Service ($) | Component Units ($) | All Funds ($) |
Property Tax Levy | 1,200,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,200,000 |
Deferred/Uncollectible | -137,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1,370,00 |
Prior Year Collections | 91,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91,000 |
Pilots/Interests & Penalties | 101,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101,000 |
Room Occupancy Tax | 42,500 | 40,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83,000 |
Abstract Charges | 131,000 | 90,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 221,000 |
Sales Tax – City Council Portion | 1,120,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,120,000 |
Sales Tax – City Council/ School Portion | 907,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 907,000 |
State Aid | 1,050,000 | 150,000 | 0 | 0 | 260,000 | 1,460,000 |
Federal Aid | 1,034,000 | 150,000 | 0 | 0 | 240,000 | 1,424,000 |
Interdepartmentals | 670,000 | 52,000 | 0 | 51,000 | 550,650 | 1,323,650 |
All Other | 600,500 | 550,000 | 450,500 | 332,000 | 235,000 | 2,168,000 |
Subtotal Revenues | 6,810,000 | 1,032,500 | 450,500 | 383,000 | 1,285,650 | 9,961,650 |
Fund Balance | ||||||
Fund Balance | 0 | 38,350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38,350 |
Subtotal Fund balance | 0 | 38,350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38,350 |
Total Revenues | 6,810,000 | 1,070,850 | 450,500 | 383,000 | 1,285,650 | 10,000,00 |
Appropriations | General Funds ($) | Special Revenue Funds ($) | Debt Service Funds ($) | Internal Service ($) | Component Units ($) | All Funds ($) |
Wages | 1,600,000 | 220,000 | 0 | 0 | 400,000 | 2,220,000 |
Benefits | 1,500,000 | 177,000 | 0 | 200,000 | 300,000 | 2,177,000 |
Mandated programs | 2,045,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,045,000 |
Contracted services | 500,000 | 155,000 | 0 | 245,000 | 300,000 | 1,200,000 |
Sales Tax – City Council | 800,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 800,000 |
Inter-fund Transfers – Operating | 20,000 | 20,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,000 |
Inter-fund Transfers – Debt Service | 26,000 | 22,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48,000 |
Scheduled Debt Service Payment | 42,000 | 40,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82,000 |
Inter-departmentals | 41,000 | 8,000 | 0 | 10,000 | 8,000 | 67,000 |
All other | 700,000 | 121,000 | 200,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 1,321,000 |
Total Expense | 7,274,000 | 763,000 | 200,000 | 605,000 | 1,158,000 | 10,000,000 |
Conclusion
The
idea around the creation and development of fund accounting entails promoting comprehensiveness
and fair presentation of non-profit undertaking transactions. The whole act of
combining both the fund accounting and financial controls is based on the fact
that specific funds have predefined purposes. Through such measures, the
government can plan effectively to ensure that total spending is predefined to
meet particular long-term goals. Regardless of the non-profit capacity of
government funding, the reporting of its expenditure activities need to happen
economically. Although financial reporting is considered complex, the info that
facilitates such reporting should center on efficiency, minimum costs, and the
economy. Overall, preparation of government budget entails making challenging
decisions at a particular cost despite that avoidance of some decisions might
trigger a far wider cost. Thus, the budget preparers need to effect implicit
trade-offs relevant for articulating the process of budget making explicitly.
Works Cited
Chan, Liam J. “Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards,” Public Money and Management, 2003, pp. 13–20.
OECD. “Quality of Governments’ Financial Reporting.” Government at a Glance, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-44-en
Walther, Larry, and Christopher J. Skousen. “Budget and Decision Making.” 2009, www.library.ku.ac.ke/wp-content/downloads/2011/08/Bookboon/Accounting/budgeting-and-decision-making.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2020.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.