internation migration and social policy underdevelopement in the domincan republic

Posted: September 25th, 2015

write a  paper that addresses each of the following areas:

1. Introduction
2. Briefly describe the topic of the research. Summarize the most pertinent past research.
3. What additional information is the present research study supposed to add to the field?
4. State the study’s hypothesis or hypotheses. If there are no hypotheses, what is the intent of the study?

1. Method
2. Who were the subjects? Were they selected in any specific manner or by any criteria? Were any subjects excluded from participation? If so, why?
3. What is the setting of the study?
4. Identify the type of design used (e.g., experimental, correlational, naturalistic, etc.) and summarize the design.
5. List all of the variables. Indicate how they were operationally defined.
6. If correlational, indicate which variables were to be associated with one another.
7. If experimental, indicate which variables are independent and which are dependent.

1. Confounds and Ethical Issues
2. Indicate whether or not there were any biases present in the selection of subjects. If so, how could they have been avoided?
3. Indicate whether or not there were any biases present during the running of the study (consider experimenter bias, subject bias, etc.).
4. Were the subjects at any risk? If so, what safeguards did the researcher introduce into the study?
5. Did you find any ethical issues that were not addressed adequately? If so, describe why you do not think they were adequate and how you would address them.

1. Results

1 Explain how the results support or do not support the hypotheses.

1. Discussion
2. What major conclusions do the authors draw?
3. How are their findings related to prior research?
4. Do the conclusions follow logically from the results? Are there any unwarranted, hidden, assumptions of causality?
5. Are the results trustworthy or not?
6. Do the authors suggest any theoretical implications? If so, what? Discuss briefly whether or not you agree with their theoretical interpretations.
7. Do the authors suggest any practical implications? If so, what?
8. Do you think this research study was well executed? If not, what were some of the flaws? How might you overcome these flaws in future research?
9. To what populations or settings would you be willing to extend or generalize the conclusions?
10. Do the authors draw any conclusions you are unwilling to accept? If so, please explain.
11. What future research do the authors suggest.